| Bert Schreiber |
Mr. Bert Schreiber: 1924-2007
Charles Bert Schreiber, Lt. USN Ret., age 83, of Bellaire, TX, died October 19, 2007 after a brief illness.
During his illness he commented that if it were his time to go, he was at peace. He had been blessed with a happy marriage, loving children and grandchildren, and had lived a full life without regret. A confirmed bachelor at age thirty, Bert was swept off his feet by Billie Ann Grant of Chattanooga, and they became engaged on their third date. After 52 years of marriage he was still smitten. Bert cherished his family life and loved his role as grandfather. He is survived by his wife Billie Ann, son Paul Schreiber and wife Tammy, daughter Janie and husband Stuart Mitcham, daughter Jo and husband Rob Gill, grandchildren Carly and Scott Schreiber, Sara and Abby Mitcham, Jessica and Logan Gill, and Taylor Dunlap, his extended family Steve and Halley Erickson and their children, his brother Carl Jr., sister-in-law Mary Katherine Schreiber and nieces and nephew. He was preceded in death by his parents and his brother Myron.
Born in Port Neches, TX, September 3, 1924 to Carl and Nellie Schreiber, Bert moved to Beaumont, TX, on his second birthday, and graduated in 1941 from Beaumont High School. In 1942, during his first year at Lamar Junior College, he volunteered for service, and was among the first group inducted into the Navy V-1 program. He was sent to Southwestern Louisiana Institute in Lafayette as an enlisted man, and then to Columbia University Midshipman's School, graduating as an Ensign in the USNR in June 1944.
He served in WWII on the LST 241 in the Pacific theater, earning numerous medals including a Purple Heart for wounds received during the battle of Okinawa.
After the war, Bert returned to LSI, graduating with a BS degree in physics in 1949. He attended the University of Texas as a postgraduate for one semester before volunteering to serve again during the Korean War aboard the LSM 359 for one year and at the Comnavmarinas area Headquarters at Guam for two years, on staff as the Atomic, Biological, Chemical Warfare Defense Officer. He maintained his Naval Reserve status and retired as a Lieutenant-USN. In 2005 he was honored in Guam for his contributions towards the effort to include Guam and its citizens under the U.S. Radiation Exposure Compensation Law.
Upon discharge from active service, he returned to Beaumont and worked in his family's business, Santa Fe Salvage Co. After moving to Houston he founded and served as the President and CEO for Santa Fe Supply, jointly owned with his brothers, and later owned and operated Sun Belt Art Supply.
He was a Second Class Scout and for ten years was the Scoutmaster for Troop 900 in Spring, TX.
After his retirement, he pursued his scientific interests, publishing numerous papers and letters in various scientific journals.
A memorial service will be held 4:00 p.m. Saturday, November 3 at Miller Funeral Home, 7723 Beechnut, Houston. Immediately after the service, the family invites Bert's friends to gather at his daughter's home or a dinner and celebration of his life.
From Neil Munch
How sad. Bert was a truly brilliant man who contributed much to science in his own way. He was never afraid to take a position (which he knew to be correct) i spite of overwhelming odds against him. AND, he had a great knack jor simplifying complcated equations ad concepts to a few simple basic conceptes.
He will truly be missed by our world-wide organization, the Natural Philosophy Alliance,(NPA) at which Bert occassionlay met and presented some some very remarkable papers.
I think he knew his health was failing. At the last NPA conference which he attended (I believe in May, 2005) at the Univ. of Connecticut--Storrs, I discussed his topics with him and he said that was probalby the last of our conferences which he would be able to attend.
May God's peace be with you and the rest of his family.
Neil Munch,
Secretary, NPA
From Bob Kerr
I had many contacts with Bert. We both independantly calcuulated the same mass for a minimum mass particle he called a neutron and I called a photon. We had many contacts but could not agree although we both arrived at an agreement. Many articles of our contacts were Published in Russ Surigs "Reality and Meanig". The particle mass waa 7.375 times 10 to the -48 grams.
Bob Kerr
From Stephen J. Crothers
Dear Colleagues,
I am saddened and shocked by the death of Mr. Bert Schreiber. It was only in June/July this year that I was in Chicago, from where I spoke to Bert on the telephone. We had a long and interesting conversation,
mostly about science, but included other things. He invited me to visit him on my next visit to the USA. Sadly that will not come to pass. He was an able and independent thinker, with great courage in the face of opposition by the scientific obscurantists. His example is one that must be emulated if science is to emerge from its current state of intellectual decrepitude. He will be sadly missed, but well remembered. His papers will persist.
My condolences to his family.
Yours faithfully,
Stephen J. Crothers.
From Prof. Joseph J. Smulsky
In the Memory of Bert Schreiber
Today I have learned, that Bert Schreiber have died October 19. It is very sad!
With Bert Schreiber I have met January 10 this year. This day I have received from him the letter (see. App. 1), in which he offered me to get acquainted with his works. In the answer I have written, that many our conclusions coincide. Practically identical titles of our papers testify to it even:
In reciprocal Bert Schreiber’s letter from January 31 was two such phrases.
“Your #2: You are the very first person who ever agreed with me on my SP#3 and #8.
We are in agreement on many items. How we get there is immaterial. No one theory is the true theory anyway, including mine. It is how many of the end results agree and are probably the truth”.
I also for the first time in life have met the person who has come to the same conclusions, as I.
Bert Schreiber to me wrote: “I know I am asking you to read a lot of my papers, but all are important and if you read them you will see why”. However I was severely ill and might not work much.
In this letter he has informed me also about Steven J. Crothers works: “I received a few days ago some e-mails from Steven J. Crothers on Black Holes. I am going to forward them to you as they are EXTREMELY IMPORTANT. PLEASE let me know if you received them. What is in these is why I have to start from scratch on my Black Hole works.”
I began to get acquainted with Steven J. Crothers works and began to discuss them with Steven J. Crothers and with Bert Schreiber. Steven J. Crothers is battling with black holers and big bangers. Therefore in the letter of June 4 to him I have written: “It is very good for science, if we in trio will write two papers about black hole and big bang with different point of view. You have my and Bert Schreiber’s materials about black holes. As you is more youthful from us and has many strength, I suggest you to write a drag of paper about black hole. Then I and Bert Schreiber will correct it, and you will send the paper to Journal”.
In last letter of February 11 (see. App. 2) Bert Schreiber has presented a number of the interesting ideas and has given comments to my report “THE REAL FORCES And UNREAL HYPOTHESES” for NPA's May 2007 Conference at UConn-Storrs. I have formed an educated reply on this letter and in the near future was going to write it. Unfortunately I was late.
The absurdity of the contemporary theoretical physics has exasperated many talented people all over the world, and they excitedly were engaged in exposure of its mistakes. Many of them have with that admitted theirs mistakes. Some of them have proved an inaccuracy of several positions of the Theory of Relativity. I think, that Bert Schreiber was one of those who saw almost all mistakes of the theoretical physics. Its works are necessary for studying and using for elimination of all mistakes in the contemporary science.
When the well-known notable scientist leaves life, it is spoken that the Science has suffered heavy loss. I believe, we should tell, that the contemporary science has suffered heavy loss because Bert Schreiber was not in its numbers!
A chief scientist of the Institute of Earth's Cryosphere of Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, doctor of physical-mathematical sciences, professor of theoretical and applied mechanics 29.10.2007 Joseph J. Smulsky
Institute of Earth's Cryosphere, P.O.B 1230, 625000, Tyumen, Russia.
http://www.smul1.newmail.ru/
Appendixes
App. 1
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 09:37:47 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Opening contact, please read (Sapere Aude)
Dear Dr. Smulsky:
I came across your name when looking over G. Walton s Sapere Aude from the links there to S. N Arthea. There are many things wrong with the current theories and with those promulgated by the iconoclasts. The iconoclasts even fight among themselves and cannot and will not combine forces so to speak. So to be brief I would like to invite you to visit my web page at (no www.) web2.airmail.net/nptbs that is more easily found by going to search and entering: collected schreiber I am the first hit.
If nothing else, I hope you will at least read the section EASY MONEY II. In this item are a few of my discoveries in both mathematics and physics. It is extended in the section FALSITIES IN CURRENT THEORIES. Note the first item that is extremely distressing to ALL the scientists. Item #5 is typical of what is being taught and promulgated worldwide. These falsities are false by the scientist own works or a common dictionary as each is explained why briefly.
As to Einstein s Theory of Relativity (GR and SRT) that is partially covered in the section SIDE PAPERS as item # s 11, 19, 23, 30, 49, 51, 53 and 58. But, 3 and 4 AUTOMATICALLY destroys the TOR and ALL current and past theories. However, these and from other sources are in the mini book GOODBYE RELATIVITY-HELLO REALITY.
Unfortunately the derivation and full proofs of all of these are in my book that can be read, downloaded or printed out for free. The home page and the section s and the paper s titles speak for themselves. Not one single scientist in this world has been able to prove I am wrong, but by the same token with extremely rare specific exceptions (speed vs. velocity is one) refuses to admit I am right. And I do not expect (it is a rare occasion) to receive any further replies.
Respectfully,
Bert Schreiber
--------
App. 2
Subject: Response
Date: 11 February 2007 8:04
Dear Professor Smulsky:
Thank you for your e-mails and attachments.
We agree to many things, but not for the same reasons. The more reasons something is wrong, the more logical it is so.
However, in you're the “THE REAL FORCES And UNREAL HYPOTHESES” I would like to make the following comments.
#1: Generically, you use velocity and speed interchangeably that causes confusion. They are not the same. Examine your paper closely and be sure when you use velocity (actually some vectors) you mean same. And where you have velocity, be sure you mean speed the resultant of said vectors.
#2 Paragraph starting Force (1): A: There is no proof that a moving magnetic field creates an electric field. See my paper on GSJ Electrostatic Fields, AND Magnetic Fields Surrounding Conductors. There is left out in the Magnetic field discussions equations etc. in ALL references; which way is the conductor WOUND?
B: Moving charged or uncharged bodies are subject to the Lorentz Operator or Factor. When v = c the part under the radical goes to 0, not 1. See my paper on GSJ Lorentz Transformation Operator or Factor.
I have a very difficult time convincing others that it is how you can predict what the APPARENT MEASURED values are OR converting the APPARENT MEASURED values back to their REAL laboratory at rest frame of reference. The equation has LIMITS in the real world and v cannot go TO c. There is one exception, but no one believes me anyway as it has been detected, just not believed.
Simply, mass increase, length and time decreases are not real.
#3 paragraph starting Hypothesis about particles: Light has an intrinsic mass. You are correct that it is not a particle. BUT, it can be treated as a particle and will give the IDENTICAL results for many of its mechanical effects when so done. Namely, most of the Photoelectric Effect. Again see my paper on GSJ The Photon: Fact or Fiction?
#4 Paragraph starting Hypothesis about the light speed-: First sentence; "If gravitation - -" is a bad speculation. If the gravitational field had any propagation speed it is millions if not billions of times faster than light.
I can't and it never will be proved, but I suspect it is instantaneous. When a mass is created, any other mass in the Universe knows it instantaneously or in 0 time. That does not mean it can cause some measurable effect.
This and the propagation speed for the electric and magnetic fields are in my Falsities in Current Theory paper as items #8 and #9 respectively.
#5 Paragraph starting Hypothesis about black holes: I have now updated and it is now posted on GSJ on Black Holes do not exist.
#6 Paragraph starting Hypothesis about a deviation: This is fully covered in my paper on GSJ Gravitational Bending of Radiation. In all papers nothing is said about the function of the frequency of the light and the end results.
#7: Last three paragraphs: We both agree on these three items.
Regards, Bert Schreiber
|
|
| Shopping Cart |
| Your cart is empty. |
| What's Related |
| These might interest you as well
Web Pages
Documents
Announcements
Form Generator
|
|
